Share

The 2017 Jeep Compass offers significantly less usable cargo space than its official 59.8 cubic feet specification suggests, struggling to accommodate common large items like a bicycle or a large flat-screen TV box that its competitors can handle with ease. This conclusion comes from a direct, real-world comparison test against other popular compact SUVs, highlighting why cargo volume numbers can be misleading for car shoppers.
Automakers measure cargo volume—the total capacity in cubic feet with the rear seats folded down—using a standardized procedure with small blocks. However, this method doesn't account for the practical realities of loading irregularly shaped items. Factors like the load floor height (how high you must lift items), intrusive wheel wells, and the overall shape of the cargo bay have a major impact on real-world usability. Based on our assessment experience, a SUV with a slightly lower official volume but a more square-shaped cargo area can often be more practical than one with a higher, but more irregularly shaped, volume.
During a comparative challenge, testers loaded a standard set of items into the Compass and its rivals, including the Honda CR-V and Ford Escape. The items were a 23-inch adult bicycle, a pair of golf bags, and an adjustable cardboard box designed to simulate a large flat-screen TV package.
The issues went beyond just the boxes. Loading the bicycle was notably more difficult due to the Compass's large load-in height, requiring extra effort to lift it over the bumper. Furthermore, the bicycle had to be carefully maneuvered around the cargo area's intrusive wheel wells, which encroach on the usable space. While the items eventually fit, the process was less straightforward than in other compact SUVs with more thoughtfully designed cargo holds.
The test involved several key competitors, and their performance underscored the Compass's limitations:
| SUV Model | Could Fit Small Box Behind Seats? | Could Fit Large Box With Seats Folded? |
|---|---|---|
| 2017 Jeep Compass | No | No |
| 2018 Chevrolet Equinox | No | Yes |
| 2017 Ford Escape | No | Yes |
| 2017 Honda CR-V | No | Yes |
| 2017 Mazda CX-5 | No | Yes |
| 2017.5 Nissan Rogue | No | Yes |
| 2018 Volkswagen Tiguan | Yes | Yes |
This table shows that while most competitors shared the limitation with the small box, the Compass was uniquely unable to handle the large box, which was a baseline capability for the other models.
Do not rely solely on manufacturer cargo volume specifications. To truly gauge if an SUV's cargo area meets your needs, follow these practical steps:
For shoppers who frequently carry bulky gear, the 2017 Jeep Compass's cargo area may prove frustrating. Its real-world performance lags behind segment leaders like the Honda CR-V and Volkswagen Tiguan. The most reliable strategy is to physically test the space with your own typical items before making a purchase decision.








